The people’s deputy of Ukraine Serhiy Leshchenko and the journalist Olena Prytula failed to comply with the decision of the Kyiv Court of Appeal in a court case No. 758/16245/17 initiated by the owner of Proton Energy company and the Glusco company Nisan Moiseev for protection of honor, dignity, business reputation, and refutation of inaccurate information.
The Kyiv Court of Appeal ruled out:
• to satisfy the lawsuit of Moiseev Nisan Lazarovych against Leshchenko Serhiy Anatoliyovych and Prytula Olena Yuriivna.
• to declare the information communicated Serhiy Leshchenko in the article "Autogas of national disgrace. Medvedchuk-Poroshenko scheme" and published on August 29, 2017 at 11:05 PM on the website http://blogs.pravda.com.ua, with the direct link (as follows) http://blogs.pravda.com.ua/authors/leschenko/59a5d392d32fa/, as false and as such that violates personal non-property rights and humiliates the business reputation of Moiseev Nisan Lazarovych namely: "SSU [Security Service of Ukraine – trans.] ... favored Medvedchuk’s market monopolization", "The scheme was carried out through his junior partner - the owner (according to the documents) of the company "Proton Energy", Israeli citizen Nisan Moiseev ...".
• to oblige the defendants Leshchenko Serhiy Anatoliyovych and Prytula Olena Yuriivna to refute the false information about Moiseev Nisan Lazarovych within 5 calendar days from the day when the court decision has come into force, by publishing the resolution part of the court’s decision in this lawsuit under the heading "Refutation" on the website http://blogs.pravda.com.ua.
The Kyiv Court of Appeal ruled out:
• to satisfy the lawsuit of Moiseev Nisan Lazarovych against Leshchenko Serhiy Anatoliyovych and Prytula Olena Yuriivna.
• to declare the information communicated Serhiy Leshchenko in the article "Autogas of national disgrace. Medvedchuk-Poroshenko scheme" and published on August 29, 2017 at 11:05 PM on the website http://blogs.pravda.com.ua, with the direct link (as follows) http://blogs.pravda.com.ua/authors/leschenko/59a5d392d32fa/, as false and as such that violates personal non-property rights and humiliates the business reputation of Moiseev Nisan Lazarovych namely: "SSU [Security Service of Ukraine – trans.] ... favored Medvedchuk’s market monopolization", "The scheme was carried out through his junior partner - the owner (according to the documents) of the company "Proton Energy", Israeli citizen Nisan Moiseev ...".
• to oblige the defendants Leshchenko Serhiy Anatoliyovych and Prytula Olena Yuriivna to refute the false information about Moiseev Nisan Lazarovych within 5 calendar days from the day when the court decision has come into force, by publishing the resolution part of the court’s decision in this lawsuit under the heading "Refutation" on the website http://blogs.pravda.com.ua.
The decision of the Court of Appeal has come into force on the day of its approval on August 16, 2018, and the obligation to publish the refutation had to be done within 5 calendar days, i.e. no later than on August 21, 2018. But as of today, the refutation of inaccurate information, distributed by Serhiy Leshchenko and Olena Prytula on the mentioned web address has not been executed yet.
Considering the above, the owner of Proton Energy offers the defendants Serhiy Leshchenko and Olena Prytula, who declare themselves in their public professional activities as law-abiding citizens, to demonstrate themselves as such and voluntarily execute the court's decision.
In case of failure to comply with the law and court obligations, the owner of Proton Energy reserves his right to execute all necessary legal procedures for its inforcement.
Considering the above, the owner of Proton Energy offers the defendants Serhiy Leshchenko and Olena Prytula, who declare themselves in their public professional activities as law-abiding citizens, to demonstrate themselves as such and voluntarily execute the court's decision.
In case of failure to comply with the law and court obligations, the owner of Proton Energy reserves his right to execute all necessary legal procedures for its inforcement.
